Saatvik Green Energy Acquires 80% Stake in Transformer Manufacturer

MERC Rejects Avaada’s ₹477 Million Change-in-Law Compensation Claim

CleanCapital Sells 120 MW Solar Project in Ohio

MERC Approves Tariffs for 8 MW Round-the-Clock Renewable Energy

EMERAM Acquires Stake in Home Energy Management Firm Solar Manager

Maharashtra Forms Panel to Review Electricity Duty on Rooftop Solar

Sterling and Wilson’s Revenue Drops 23% but Profit Surges in Q4 FY 2026

Adani Green Energy Operationalizes 292 MW Solar Project in Gujarat

EIE Renewables to Acquire 150 MWh Battery Storage Project in Bihar

MERC Approves 60 MW Wind-Solar PPA Withdrawal, Citing High Tariff

<table id="amazon-polly-audio-table">
						<tr>
						<td id="amazon-polly-audio-tab">
							<div id="amazon-ai-player-label">Listen to this article</div>
							<div id="amazon-ai-player-container">
			<audio class="amazon-ai-player" id="amazon-ai-player" preload="none" controls controlsList="nodownload" >
				<source type="audio/mpeg" src="https://cms.mercomindia.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/amazon_polly_87414.mp3?version=1764678783">
			</audio>
		</div>
							<div id="amazon-polly-subscribe-tab"></div>
							<div id="amazon-polly-by-tab"></div>
						</td>
						</tr>
					</table>The Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (<a href="https://cercind.gov.in/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">CERC</a>) has upheld Central Transmission Utility of India’s (CTUIL) decision to cancel transmission connectivity for <a href="https://www.inoxgreen.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Inox Green Energy Services</a>’ 300 MW wind projects at Bhuj II pooling substation in Gujarat.
The Commission directed the petitioner, Inox Green, to reapply for connectivity with CTUIL, since it had failed to demonstrate any progress in land acquisition or financial closure for the projects.
Background
In 2018, received a letter of award from Solar Energy Corporation of India (SECI) to set up 200 MW and 100 MW wind projects in Kutch, Gujarat, under Tranche III and Tranche IV auctions.
It formed six special-purpose vehicles (SPVs) for 300 MW and signed power purchase agreements with SECI.
Inox said that due to various factors beyond its control, the projects were delayed. SECI acknowledged the factors behind the delay by granting multiple extensions.
Inox said it has made considerable investments in executing the wind projects, including developing a 220 kV transmission line and substations, purchasing a 150 MVA transformer, and acquiring land for pooling substations.
SECI had extended the time for obtaining financial closure because the Gujarat government had delayed allotting land for the projects.
In 2020, in view of the delay in operationalizing the long-term access, SECI extended the time for financial closure and the scheduled commercial operation date (SCOD) from November 2019 to April 2020.
Further, SECI extended the SCOD by another 30 days due to the COVID-19 lockdown. In December 2020, SECI extended the SCOD until October 2021.
When SECI refused to grant further extensions, Inox approached the dispute resolution committee (DRC), which refused to grant any relief.
In 2022, CTUIL issued transmission connectivity under long-term access to the petitioner for its projects.
In 2024, the Power Ministry approved the installation of the dedicated overhead transmission line, including the transmission system.
Further, CTUIL sent a notice to Inox for the payment of one-time general network access (GNA) charges of ₹100,000 (~$1,119)/MW. It also issued an invoice for payment of bilateral charges of ₹80 million (~$895,280) against the transmission facility developed for the projects.
Inox said that CTUIL’s interconnecting common evacuation infrastructure was originally scheduled to be commissioned in 2019 but was rescheduled to 2022. The delay led lenders to refuse to fund the projects due to uncertainty over connectivity. It said that the delay in granting connectivity also increased the cost of wind turbine generators.
After multiple follow-ups with Inox, CTUIL invoked the bank guarantee, and the petitioner paid ₹30 million (~$335,730) toward one-time GNA charges.
In 2025, CTUIL also revoked the project’s connectivity and withdrew the GNA granted to the petitioner.
SECI said that, since the projects were not commissioned even six months after the SCOD, i.e., February 2023, the developer was liable to pay liquidated damages.
SECI recovered the liquidated damages by encashing the performance bank guarantee submitted by Inox. However, SECI did not cancel the PPAs.
SECI added that if the petitioner commits to completing the wind projects and the utilities purchase power in accordance with the tariffs set out in the PPAs, it will enter into a tripartite agreement and consider a mutual settlement proposal.
The petitioner approached the Commission to issue an appropriate direction to the respondents to refrain from revoking the 300 MW Stage II connectivity and long-term access. Alternatively, it pleaded with the Commission to allow it to retain the 300 MW of connectivity granted through the land bank guarantee route.
It also sought directions to CTUIL to reserve the 300 MW connectivity at the 220 kV Bhuj pool and not allot it to any other entity.
The petitioner also asked the Commission to prevent any coercive action against it for failing to commission the 300 MW of projects and to prevent the imposition of any penalties.
Commission’s Analysis
The Commission said the petitioner failed to submit documents proving that the projects were completed within the extended scheduled date and that financial closure had been reached.
The Commission noted that the DRC examined the projects&#8217; progress and found that the petitioner failed to justify the delay in their execution. It said that Inox’s inability to complete land acquisition or achieve financial closure on the projects demonstrated a lack of seriousness..
The petitioner was unable to submit details of land acquisition for the projects, and the DCR found no merit in its plea for a further extension of the SCOD,
The Commission said that Inox delayed approaching the Commission by three months, even after the DRC issued an unfavorable report.
The Commission noted that the petitioner has been holding onto the connectivity for six years. CTUIL should have revoked the connectivity when it failed to commission the projects by 2023.
Upholding CTUIL’s decision to revoke the connectivity, the Commission ordered Inox to apply afresh for connectivity with CTUIL.
Recently, the government <a href="https://www.mercomindia.com/government-to-cancel-reia-awarded-projects-without-ppa-psa-prospects" target="_blank" rel="noopener">directed</a> renewable energy implementing agencies to close all legacy bids and cancel the letters of award for all renewable energy projects for which PPA and power sale agreements are not feasible by November 30, 2025.
Subscribe to Mercom’s real-time <a href="https://www.mercomindia.com/product/mercoms-renewable-energy-regulatory-updates" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Regulatory Updates</a> to ensure you don’t miss any critical updates from the renewable industry.

CERC Backs Grid Connectivity Revocation for Inox’s 300 MW Wind Projects

The Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE) has issued an order to establish a system to resolve disputes between solar and wind energy developers and the Solar Energy Corporation of India (SECI) or the National Thermal Power Corporation (NTPC).
The solar and wind power developers had been requesting the MNRE to set up a dispute resolution mechanism to sort out the numerous issues that are both within and outside the scope of contractual agreements.
The disputes under consideration are usually between the developers and SECI and NTPC. After thorough consideration, the MNRE has agreed to setup an independent, transparent, and unbiased Dispute Resolution Committee (DRC).
Upon thorough scrutiny of the various problems, the government has charted a framework for the setting up of a DRC for the resolution of these issues. As per the framework, the committee will comprise of three distinguished members and will be set up with the approval of the minister of the MNRE. The upper age limit for DRC members is 70 years. The members of the DRC will be selected from the Delhi NCR region and will not have any conflict of interest in any way. The DRC will assist in the resolution of conflicts in solar and wind projects, programs, and those that are being implemented by SECI or NTPC.
The DRC will be handling cases pertaining mostly to time request extensions along with various other common issues being faced. These would be cases wherein time extension decisions by SECI are challenged based on contract terms.
All cases of appeal against the decisions given by SECI on the extension of time requests appeal to extend timelines based on unforeseen circumstances such as natural calamities, extension in connectivity, and delays in handing over the land by solar developers will be dealt with by the agreements of the contracts.
Under these circumstances, the solar and wind power developers are required to make an application for grant of Extension of Time (EoT) within the stipulated time as listed in the contract. Any breach in terms of the contract or if applications are not filed within the contractually stated period, the SECI or NTPC can reject the application.
Accepted applications will be accurately reviewed, and decisions will be made within 21 days after the application date. In case a developer does not accept the decision by SECI or NTPC, then a plea can be made to the DRC within 21 days of the SECI or NTPC order being filed. The developer will incur a fee in this case, which will be set by the DRC. The fee will have to be more than at least 5% of the impact of the decision being challenged and will have to be deposited into the payment security fund of SECI or NTPC for the project under consideration.
In case time extensions are unpredictable and not covered under the terms of the contract, the DRC upon consultation with the MNRE will arrive at an appropriate decision. Such unexpected situations usually arise if there is a delay in the land being allocated to the developer due to various reasons.
After reviewing all cases, the DRC will submit its recommendations to the MNRE within 21 days of the reference date. The DRC’s suggestions combined with the MNRE’s review will be put forth before the ministry, and it will examine these recommendations and send them to the minister. DRC members will be paid ₹4,000 (~$57)/sitting fees and not exceeding ₹20,000(~286)/member per case to be paid by SECI or NTPC. The DRC meetings will be conducted on the premises of SECI and NTPC.
The ministry will examine and send such recommendations to the minister with the comments of IFD within 21 days of the receipt of a recommendation from the DRC. The DRC can interact with the various parties involved in the dispute without the lawyers.
The Indian <a href="https://mercomindia.com/land-impediment-large-scale-solar/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">solar</a> market has grown from a 3 GW installed capacity in 2014 to 30 GW in 2019. With the rapid expansion of solar and wind sectors, the disputes involving the stakeholders have also increased. Besides domestic disputes, India’s solar and wind sectors have also been embroiled in a series of trade disputes, as was reported by <a href="https://mercomindia.com/roundup-trade-disputes-india-solar-wind/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Mercom last year</a>.

MNRE Orders Setting Up of Dispute Resolution Committee for Solar and Wind Sectors

dispute-resolution-committee

Get the most relevant India solar and clean energy news.

RECENT POSTS